NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 500 Watt
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 2612
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 438
• Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11329 vs 6114
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 16.999
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.659
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3652
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2523
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3652
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2523

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950

• Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 1408 vs 640
• Around 62% better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• 250x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 vs 642.715
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 vs 26.532
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 vs 133.458
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 3329
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3904 2612
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	512 438
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11329 6114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 16.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 899.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 1.659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 49.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 251.203
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 11657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 11657

Compare specifications (specs)