NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2611
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 vs 441
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11522 vs 6105
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 16.999
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.659
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3652
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2523
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3652
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2523
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 14 December 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 2611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 vs 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11522 vs 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2523 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 1408 vs 640
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 vs 642.715
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 vs 26.532
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 vs 133.458
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 3329
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 3329
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 70.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,252.8 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 vs 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 vs 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 vs 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 vs 3329 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 2611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11522 | 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 49.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 251.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 11657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 11657 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1265 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GM107 | Cayman |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 14 December 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 711 | 713 |
Price now | $299.01 | $89.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 45.34 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1408 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |