NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 500 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2611
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 vs 441
  • Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11522 vs 6105
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 16.999
  • Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.659
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3652
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2523
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3652
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2523
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 February 2014 vs 14 December 2010
Boost clock speed 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 500 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3901 vs 2611
PassMark - G2D Mark 514 vs 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 11522 vs 6105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 42.463 vs 16.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.933 vs 1.659
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4843 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683 vs 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4843 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683 vs 2523

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950

  • Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
  • 2.2x more pipelines: 1408 vs 640
  • Around 62% better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
  • 250x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 vs 642.715
  • Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 vs 26.532
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 vs 133.458
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 3329
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 3329
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 70.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1408 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,252.8 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 899.056 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.698 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 251.203 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11657 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11657 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3901
2611
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
514
441
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11522
6105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42.463
16.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
642.715
899.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.933
1.659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.532
49.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
133.458
251.203
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4843
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3683
2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
11657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4843
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3683
2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
11657
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark 3901 2611
PassMark - G2D Mark 514 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 11522 6105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 42.463 16.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 642.715 899.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.933 1.659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.532 49.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 133.458 251.203
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4843 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 11657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4843 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 11657
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1265 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD Radeon HD 6950

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale 3
Code name GM107 Cayman
Launch date 18 February 2014 14 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $149 $299
Place in performance rating 711 713
Price now $299.01 $89.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 15.02 45.34
Design AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1085 MHz 800 MHz
Core clock speed 1020 MHz
CUDA cores 640
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops 2,252.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 1408
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s 70.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 500 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,640 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCIe 2.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm) 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.4 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire