AMD Radeon HD 6990 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6990 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68.0 GTexel / s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1600
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 2,720.0 gflops
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3013 vs 2727
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.264 vs 9.718
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 840.452 vs 738.1
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.76 vs 0.867
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.903 vs 27.153
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 118.756
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 March 2011 vs 9 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1600 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 2,720.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3013 vs 2727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 vs 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 vs 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 vs 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 vs 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 vs 118.756 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 830 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 630
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 830 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 vs 630 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6990
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3013 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 | 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 | 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 | 118.756 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6990 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Antilles | Cypress |
Launch date | 8 March 2011 | 9 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $3,499 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 627 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 830 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,640 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 295 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |