NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6990

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3594 vs 3013
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.986 vs 17.264
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.362 vs 1.76
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 4562
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 4562

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 830 MHz vs 797 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 89.26 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1344
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 2,142 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 555
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 840.452 vs 826.477
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.903 vs 35.269
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 55.394
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3657
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3594 3013
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	555 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.986 17.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	826.477 840.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.362 1.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.269 53.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.394 265.302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6030 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6030 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3356

Compare specifications (specs)