AMD Radeon HD 7470M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7470M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 393 vs 237
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3322 vs 2626
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 393 vs 237 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3322 vs 2626 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 13.0 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 311.04 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 vs 408
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 3074
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 3074
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1422
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1422
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 vs 408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 3074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 3074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1422 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7470M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7470M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 408 | 774 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 393 | 237 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3322 | 2626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3074 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3074 | 3275 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1422 | 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1422 | 2053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7470M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Seymour | GF108 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1034 | 1342 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $69.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||

