AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs AMD FirePro V3900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and AMD FirePro V3900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 655 / 600 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 53% higher pipelines: 736 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 / 40 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8444 vs 1564
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2097 vs 1631
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2097 vs 1631
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 7 February 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 736 vs 480 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 / 40 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8444 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2097 vs 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2097 vs 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 640 vs 519
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 97
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 157
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 157
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 vs 519 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 97 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 vs 157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 vs 157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V3900
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics | AMD FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 519 | 640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 | 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8444 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 157 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 157 | 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2097 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2097 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics | AMD FirePro V3900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 7 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1335 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Code name | Turks | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 / 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 736 | 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with others
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
NVIDIATesla M2070
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
AMDFirePro V3900
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 7500G
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8450G
