AMD Radeon HD 7650M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 440 vs 107
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 33
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 1458
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 1458
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 3 March 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 vs 107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 vs 33 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 vs 1458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 vs 1458 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3307 vs 1192
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1774 vs 1733
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1774 vs 1733
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3307 vs 1192 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1774 vs 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1774 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 | 107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 33 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1192 | 3307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.375 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 | 1458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 | 1774 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 | 1458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 | 1774 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Thames | GT216 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 3 March 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1515 | 1517 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 550 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| HybridPower | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||