AMD Radeon HD 7650M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 6.7x more pipelines: 480 vs 72
  • 2.7x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 162 gflops
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 926
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1733 vs 1450
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 926
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1733 vs 1450
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 January 2012 vs 15 June 2009
Pipelines 480 vs 72
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops vs 162 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1949 vs 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1733 vs 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1949 vs 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1733 vs 1450

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 561 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 13.46 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 440
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 57
  • 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7043 vs 1192
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 561 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 13.46 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 494 vs 440
PassMark - G2D Mark 66 vs 57
Geekbench - OpenCL 7043 vs 1192

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
440
494
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
57
66
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1192
7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1949
926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1949
926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1450
Name AMD Radeon HD 7650M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
PassMark - G3D Mark 440 494
PassMark - G2D Mark 57 66
Geekbench - OpenCL 1192 7043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 220.859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 44.624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1949 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1733 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1949 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1733 1450
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 680

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7650M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla 2.0
Code name Thames GT215
Launch date 7 January 2012 15 June 2009
Place in performance rating 1515 1518
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 550 MHz
Core clock speed 450 MHz 561 MHz
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 162 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 480 72
Texture fill rate 10.8 GTexel / s 13.46 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 727 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 35.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 2200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA