AMD Radeon HD 7650M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 6.7x more pipelines: 480 vs 72
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 162 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 926
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1733 vs 1450
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 926
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1733 vs 1450
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 15 June 2009 |
Pipelines | 480 vs 72 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops vs 162 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 vs 926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 vs 1450 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 vs 926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 vs 1450 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 561 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 13.46 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 440
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 57
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7043 vs 1192
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 561 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.46 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 vs 440 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 vs 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7043 vs 1192 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 | 494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 66 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1192 | 7043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.375 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 | 926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 | 1450 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 | 926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 | 1450 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Thames | GT215 |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1515 | 1518 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 561 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 162 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | 13.46 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |