AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7750 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1703 vs 1250
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 313
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 9.69
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 1.004
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 26.748

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
• Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 566.052
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 98.126
• 8.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 305
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 vs 1439
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3295
• 8.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 305
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 vs 1439
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1703 1250
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	423 313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.658 9.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	566.052 615.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.182 1.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.143 26.748
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.126 115.157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1439 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3295 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1439 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3295 3358

Compare specifications (specs)