AMD Radeon HD 7750 versus AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7750 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1125 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1703 versus 1250
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 versus 313
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 9.69
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 1.004
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 26.748
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 versus 21 January 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 108 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1703 versus 1250 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 versus 313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 26.748 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 900 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 512
- Environ 66% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 566.052
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 98.126
- 8.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 305
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3295
- 8.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 305
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3295
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1703 | 1250 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 115.157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3459 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7750 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Juniper |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 | 21 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1138 | 1141 |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $76.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | 27.17 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 7750 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon E6760
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
