NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon HD 7750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1740 vs 1693
• 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 305
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 1439
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3295
• 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 305
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 1439
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3295

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750

• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 233
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 15.673
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 509.958
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 1.512
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 30.422
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 53.992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1740 1693
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	233 427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.673 21.658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.958 566.052
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.512 2.182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.422 37.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.992 98.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3295

Compare specifications (specs)