AMD Radeon HD 7970M vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7970M and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3569 vs 2282
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 496 vs 418
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5094 vs 3977
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3213
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5094 vs 3977
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3213
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 18 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3569 vs 2282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 496 vs 418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 vs 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 vs 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3213 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 1280
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
Texture fill rate | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1600 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | ATI Radeon HD 5970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3569 | 2282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 496 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17210 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3213 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7970M | ATI Radeon HD 5970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Wimbledon | Hemlock |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 18 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 615 | 616 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,154 million |
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 305 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | 2x 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |