NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40m and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 17210
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 51.181
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 1121.002
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 5.355
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 81.527
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 256.99
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 vs 17210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 vs 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 vs 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 81.527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 vs 256.99 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 245 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 496 vs 184
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3569 vs 3143
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 496 vs 184 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3569 vs 3143 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 | 17210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | 81.527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | 256.99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 496 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 | 3569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Wimbledon |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 613 | 615 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |