AMD Radeon HD 8240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8240 and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 234 vs 141
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 988 vs 734
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 988 vs 734

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 978
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 63
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1717 vs 1627
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1717 vs 1627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	978 2872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	63 171
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	234 141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 734
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1627 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1627 1717

Compare specifications (specs)