AMD Radeon HD 8240 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8240 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8240

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date 23 May 2013 vs 1 December 2011
Pipelines 128 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

  • Around 68% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1396 vs 978
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 63
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 292 vs 246
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 988
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 988
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 1627
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 1627
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1396 vs 978
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 vs 63
PassMark - G3D Mark 292 vs 246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1602 vs 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1602 vs 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2848 vs 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2848 vs 1627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
978
1396
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
63
113
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
246
292
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
988
1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
988
1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
2848
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
2848
Name AMD Radeon HD 8240 NVIDIA GeForce 610M
Geekbench - OpenCL 978 1396
PassMark - G2D Mark 63 113
PassMark - G3D Mark 246 292
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 988 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 988 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1627 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1627 2848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 664

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8240 NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Essentials

Architecture GCN Fermi
Code name Temash GF108
Launch date 23 May 2013 1 December 2011
Place in performance rating 1533 1535
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 672 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 128 48
Boost clock speed 900 MHz
CUDA cores 48
Floating-point performance 129.02 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt
Transistor count 585 million
Video decoders H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p

API support

DirectX 11.1 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bus width 64bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16

Technologies

CUDA
Optimus