Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon HD 8240
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and AMD Radeon HD 8240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1292 vs 978
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 63
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 361 vs 246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1292 vs 978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 63 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 361 vs 246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 vs 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 vs 1627 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8240
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 988 vs 956
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 988 vs 956
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 18 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 vs 956 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 vs 956 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8240
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon HD 8240 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1292 | 978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 63 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 361 | 246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon HD 8240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | Temash |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1532 | 1533 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 18 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
