AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

ATI Radeon HD 5570

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 39 Watt
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 4.393
5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 235.572
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 0.454
4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 11.345
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 49.016

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 November 2013 vs 11 October 2011
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 39 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197 vs 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192 vs 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774 vs 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241 vs 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569 vs 49.016

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
4.1x more texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
3.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 128
5.1x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 265
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 78
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1378 vs 1211
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 930
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1631
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 930
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1631

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	13 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	400 vs 128
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	477 vs 265
PassMark - G2D Mark	195 vs 78
Geekbench - OpenCL	1378 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1883 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1883 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

265

477

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

195

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1211

1378

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.197

4.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1322.192

235.572

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.774

0.454

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.241

11.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

224.569

49.016

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1883

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1883

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3360

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark	265	477
PassMark - G2D Mark	78	195
Geekbench - OpenCL	1211	1378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197	4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192	235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774	0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241	11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569	49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	930	1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1631	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	930	1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1631	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1160

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	ATI Radeon HD 5570
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Kalindi	Turks
Launch date	23 November 2013	11 October 2011
Place in performance rating	1370	1387
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series
Technical info
Core clock speed	400 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	102.4 gflops	520.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	128	400
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s	13 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	39 Watt
Transistor count	1,178 million	716 million
Boost clock speed		650 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		165 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1000 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity