AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 6.367
- 11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 118.389
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 0.396
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 7.921
- 23.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 9.393
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 1 March 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 vs 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 vs 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 vs 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 vs 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 vs 9.393 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 vs 265
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 78
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1822 vs 1211
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 930
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2261 vs 1631
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 930
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2261 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops vs 102.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 734 vs 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1822 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2261 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2261 vs 1631 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA Quadro K600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 | 734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1211 | 1822 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Kalindi | GK107 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1369 | 1371 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $78.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 876 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz |