AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 2x more core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 9.563
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 490.588
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 November 2013 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 40
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197 vs 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192 vs 490.588

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 265
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 78
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3166 vs 1211
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1103 vs 930
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1713 vs 1631
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1103 vs 930
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1713 vs 1631
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 587 vs 265
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 vs 78
Geekbench - OpenCL 3166 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1103 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1713 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1103 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1713 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
265
587
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
78
225
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1211
3166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.197
9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1322.192
490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
930
1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
930
1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
1713
Name AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark 265 587
PassMark - G2D Mark 78 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 1211 3166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192 490.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 930 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1631 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 930 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1631 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 713

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP Intel HD Graphics 5000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Generation 7.5
Code name Kalindi Haswell GT3
Launch date 23 November 2013 27 May 2013
Place in performance rating 1370 1371
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 200 MHz
Floating-point performance 102.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 128 40
Texture fill rate 3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 1,178 million 1,300 million
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Memory type System Shared
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync