AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 9.563
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 490.588
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 vs 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 vs 490.588 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 265
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 78
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3166 vs 1211
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1103 vs 930
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1713 vs 1631
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1103 vs 930
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1713 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 vs 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3166 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 vs 1631 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 | 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1211 | 3166 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Kalindi | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1370 | 1371 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 1,300 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |