NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 561 vs 265
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 vs 78
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2498 vs 1211
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 930
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 1631
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 930
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 102.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 561 vs 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 vs 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 vs 1631 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 2.692
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 161.29
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 0.55
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 11.858
- 12.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 17.753
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 vs 2.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 vs 161.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 vs 0.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 vs 11.858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 vs 17.753 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 561 | 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 | 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 | 1211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | 18.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | 1322.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | 1.774 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | 47.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | 224.569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 23 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1368 | 1369 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 102.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |