AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 135 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 77 vs 71

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 13x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• 4.1x better floating-point performance: 416.0 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 555 vs 266
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1631
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	266 555
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	77 71
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3342

Compare specifications (specs)