AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 5x more pipelines: 160 vs 32
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 145
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 29
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 vs 145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 29 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 9.6 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2744 vs 2093
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2744 vs 2093
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2744 vs 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2744 vs 2093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 29 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | 2744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | 2744 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Caicos | G96 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1535 | 1532 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Gigaflops | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 16 (DDR2) / 25 (GDDR3) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 |