Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1338 vs 871
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 360 vs 263
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1338 vs 871 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 360 vs 263 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 160 vs 18
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 94
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2093 vs 1635
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2093 vs 1635
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1078 vs 956
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1078 vs 956
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 672 vs 470
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 672 vs 470
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 18 |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 vs 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 vs 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 vs 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 vs 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 vs 470 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1338 | 871 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 174 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 360 | 263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1534 | 1535 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |