AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 41 Watt
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.365 vs 9.393

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• 2x more texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 192 vs 160
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 728 vs 263
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 174
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1830 vs 872
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 2.021
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 118.389 vs 104.327
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.396 vs 0.239
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.921 vs 5.628
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 672
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1078
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2261 vs 2093
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 672
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1078
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2261 vs 2093

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	263 728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	174 278
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	872 1830
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.021 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	104.327 118.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.239 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.628 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.365 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	672 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1078 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2093 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	672 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1078 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2093 2261

Compare specifications (specs)