AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
  • Around 30% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Launch date 25 October 2013 vs 22 March 2012
Pipelines 480 vs 384
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 60 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 vs 1088
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 vs 1088
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 vs 1519
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 vs 1519
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 vs 2278
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 vs 2278
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1476 vs 1088
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1476 vs 1088
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1963 vs 1519
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1963 vs 1519
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2580 vs 2278
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2580 vs 2278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1088
1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1088
1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1519
1963
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1519
1963
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2278
2580
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2278
2580
Name AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1088 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1088 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1519 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1519 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2278 2580
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2278 2580
PassMark - G3D Mark 925
PassMark - G2D Mark 199
Geekbench - OpenCL 3184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 275.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.381

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Kepler
Code name Turks GK107
Launch date 25 October 2013 22 March 2012
Place in performance rating 1343 1346
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 480 384
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 32 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 1,270 million
Boost clock speed 645 MHz
CUDA cores 384

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus