AMD Radeon HD 8650G versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8650G and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 mois plus tard
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 May 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Environ 57% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 837 MHz versus 533 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3468 versus 1731
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 versus 736
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 versus 736
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 versus 2062
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 versus 2062
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 versus 138
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1095 versus 524
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz versus 533 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 versus 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 versus 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 versus 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 versus 2062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 versus 2062 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 versus 138 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1095 versus 524 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1731 | 3468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | 2255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | 2255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 180 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 1095 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Richland | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1273 | 1274 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 720 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 642.8 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 8650G avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
ATIFirePro M7820
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 8650G vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
