AMD Radeon HD 8650G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650G and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2062 vs 1963
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2062 vs 1963
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3259
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3259
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 138 vs 41
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2013 vs 1 December 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 vs 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 vs 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 vs 41 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 vs 415 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 533 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 533 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 41 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 | 415 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Tesla |
Code name | Richland | G92 |
Launch date | 1 May 2013 | 1 December 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1279 | 1282 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |