AMD Radeon HD 8670D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670D and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 610 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 96
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3319
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 844 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3319 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1222 vs 534
- 8.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18229 vs 2071
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1222 vs 534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18229 vs 2071 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 1222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 96 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2071 | 18229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Richland | GT200B |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1202 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Price now | $178.89 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 189 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |