AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon HD 6970

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon HD 6970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 880 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 550 Watt
• Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 1704 MHz vs 1375 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4654 vs 2835
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 18.676
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 920.398
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 1.835
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 52.219
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 273.175

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970

• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 338
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 vs 23264
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5372 vs 1715
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1177
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1724
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5372 vs 1715
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1177
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4654 2835
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 431
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23264 35739
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.628 18.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1762.559 920.398
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.26 1.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.313 52.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	617.099 273.175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 5372
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 5372
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3358

Compare specifications (specs)