AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
3.1x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1704 MHz vs 1600 MHz
7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 632
4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23341 vs 5257

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 June 2017 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed	1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	1704 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4979 vs 632
Geekbench - OpenCL	23341 vs 5257

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M

15x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 300 Watt
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 371
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 1177
Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1724
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 1177
Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1724

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	479 vs 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2632 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 vs 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2632 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4979

632

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

371

479

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

23341

5257

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1177

2632

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1724

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1177

2632

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1724

3339

Name	AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU	AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark	4979	632
PassMark - G2D Mark	371	479
Geekbench - OpenCL	23341	5257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	102.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1762.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	617.099
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1177	2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1724	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1177	2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1724	3339

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU	AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Vega 10	Whistler
Launch date	27 June 2017	7 January 2012
Place in performance rating	671	674
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	716 million
Floating-point performance		360.0 gflops
Pipelines		400
Texture fill rate		9 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Memory clock speed	1704 MHz	1600 MHz
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0