AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 8.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 versus 605
- 6.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22636 versus 3385
- 11.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 versus 8.915
- 12x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 versus 146.479
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 versus 1.178
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 versus 10.689
- 92.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 versus 6.64
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 1 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 versus 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22636 versus 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 versus 6.64 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 371
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 1177
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 versus 1724
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 1177
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 versus 1724
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 versus 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 versus 1724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 963 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22636 | 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 682 | 685 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 1704 MHz |