AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 7x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 330
- 21.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10229 vs 476
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1832
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 vs 330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10229 vs 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 402
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3350
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 402 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 | 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10229 | 476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3493 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Lexa | Seymour |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 7 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 804 | 807 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 7 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |