AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 215 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
• 4.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 27.93
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 97.852
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3614
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3317
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3614
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3317

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 1832
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 402
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11010 vs 10229
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 438.581
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 2.268
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 46.988
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 vs 3241
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1832 3107
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10229 11010
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3317

Compare specifications (specs)