AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 601 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 350
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10229 vs 5107
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 24.713
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 2.189
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 28.929
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 68.712

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

• Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2752 vs 1832
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 685.1 vs 438.581
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 3241
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1832 2752
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 350
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10229 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3353

Compare specifications (specs)