AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2629 vs 1901
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10611 vs 9694
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.959 vs 24.788
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 638.196
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.893 vs 2.619
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 41.414
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 vs 112.347
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 2809
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 2809
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 30 June 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2629 vs 1901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10611 vs 9694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 vs 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 vs 638.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 vs 2.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 vs 41.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 vs 112.347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 432
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3607
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3607
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3607 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2629 | 1901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10611 | 9694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 638.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 2.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 41.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 112.347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 704 | 764 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
