AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 323
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 843.503
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 99% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 2629
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 10611
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 29.959
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 2.893
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 122.245
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4551
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3607
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4551
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	432 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10611 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.959 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	864.134 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.893 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.305 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	122.245 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336

Compare specifications (specs)