AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 365 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 394
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 vs 107.239
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3330
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 24 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 vs 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 vs 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 vs 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 2515
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12959 vs 9994
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 29.959
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 864.134
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 2.893
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3607
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3607
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 2515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12959 vs 9994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 vs 29.959 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 864.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 2.893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3607 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2515 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9994 | 12959 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Lexa | GF110 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 24 March 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 721 | 773 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $184 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |