AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and AMD Radeon R9 M385 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

AMD Radeon R9 M385

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2565 vs 2061
Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 244
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 3002
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3322
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 3002
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3322

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2565 vs 2061
PassMark - G2D Mark	429 vs 244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607 vs 3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607 vs 3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3322

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385

Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,248 gflops

Texture fill rate	56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,792 gflops vs 1,248 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2565

2061

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

429

244

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3002

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3322

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3002

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3322

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	AMD Radeon R9 M385
PassMark - G3D Mark	2565	2061
PassMark - G2D Mark	429	244
Geekbench - OpenCL	10585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607	3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607	3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3322

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	AMD Radeon R9 M385
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Lexa	Strato
Launch date	12 June 2017	5 May 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	729	730
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	1,792 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore