AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and AMD Radeon R9 M385 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2543 vs 2061
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 244
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 3002
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3322
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 3002
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2543 vs 2061 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 vs 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 vs 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 vs 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3322 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2543 | 2061 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Strato |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 728 | 729 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 with others
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
