AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 832.248

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 2629
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 432
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 10611
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 29.959
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 2.893
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 49.305
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 122.245
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 4551
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3607
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 4551
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 4500
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	432 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10611 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.959 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	864.134 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.893 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.305 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	122.245 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3348

Compare specifications (specs)