AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 450

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
3.1x more texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
9.8x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1180
Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 390
Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9114 vs 5083
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2095
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723 vs 1180
PassMark - G2D Mark	619 vs 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	9114 vs 5083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3347 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3347 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1749
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1749

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285 vs 1749

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2723

1180

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

619

390

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9114

5083

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3285

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 450	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723	1180
PassMark - G2D Mark	619	390
Geekbench - OpenCL	9114	5083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3347	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1749	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3347	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1749	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 450	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Baffin	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	30 October 2016	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	786	661
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	640	40
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	392 million
Boost clock speed		1300 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync