NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and AMD Radeon Pro 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1749
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1749
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2018 vs 30 October 2016
Core clock speed 1455 MHz vs 800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

  • Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
  • Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
  • Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1652
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 239
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9114 vs 6366
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2622
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2622
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 256
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 vs 1652
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 vs 239
Geekbench - OpenCL 9114 vs 6366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3347 vs 2622
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3347 vs 2622

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 450

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
2723
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
239
619
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6366
9114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2622
3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2622
3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3685
1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3685
1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3344
Name NVIDIA Quadro P500 AMD Radeon Pro 450
PassMark - G3D Mark 1652 2723
PassMark - G2D Mark 239 619
Geekbench - OpenCL 6366 9114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2622 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2622 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 126.562

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P500 AMD Radeon Pro 450

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 4.0
Code name GP108 Baffin
Launch date 5 January 2018 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 785 786
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1519 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 679.9 gflops 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 256 640
Texture fill rate 21.25 GTexel / s 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,800 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12_1 12.0 (12_0)
Vulkan
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 32.1 GB / s 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
Multi Monitor
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0