NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and AMD Radeon Pro 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1749
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1749
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 30 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1652
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 239
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9114 vs 6366
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2622
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2622
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 vs 1652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 vs 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9114 vs 6366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 vs 2622 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | AMD Radeon Pro 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1652 | 2723 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 619 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6366 | 9114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 568.609 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.409 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.562 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P500 | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Baffin |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 785 | 786 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |