AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 548
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.784 vs 30.455
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1749 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1671
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 22 July 2014
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 68 Watt
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	619 vs 548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.784 vs 30.455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1749 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1749 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 2723
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 9114
Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 26.707
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 568.609
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 2.409
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 126.562
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3347
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3347

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572 vs 2723
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 9114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 vs 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094 vs 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 vs 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 vs 126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 3347

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2723

3572

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

619

548

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9114

12020

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.707

40.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

568.609

588.094

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.409

3.205

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.784

30.455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

126.562

166.26

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

1671

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

1671

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 450	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723	3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	619	548
Geekbench - OpenCL	9114	12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.707	40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	568.609	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.409	3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.784	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	126.562	166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3347	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1749	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344	1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3347	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1749	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344	1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 450	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Baffin	GM107
Launch date	30 October 2016	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	786	787
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$395.75
Price now		$343.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.01
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	1046 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	640
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	68 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1124 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		202 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0