AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 576
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 April 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 576 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39403 vs 29471
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7730
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3595
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 5996
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39403 vs 29471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 vs 5996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29471 | 39403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 576 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 7878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 359 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
