AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1216 MHz
694.4x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 165 Watt
1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1216 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 165 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33393 vs 29471
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 vs 7730
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 vs 7730
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3595
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 vs 617
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11127 vs 5996

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1280
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	33393 vs 29471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9566 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9566 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3690 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3690 vs 3595
PassMark - G2D Mark	798 vs 617
PassMark - G3D Mark	11127 vs 5996

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29471

33393

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

9566

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

9566

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3335

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

617

798

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5996

11127

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471	33393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3335
PassMark - G2D Mark	617	798
PassMark - G3D Mark	5996	11127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		477.015
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4330

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	GM204
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	19 September 2014
Place in performance rating	354	358
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$549
Price now		$605.06
Value for money (0-100)		21.18
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1216 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2048
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	144 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	165 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,200 million
CUDA cores		2048
Floating-point performance		4,981 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pins
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	224 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
BatteryBoost
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Surround