AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1216 MHz
  • 694.4x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 165 Watt
  • 1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed 1250 MHz vs 1216 MHz
Texture fill rate 100 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 165 Watt
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34824 vs 29267
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 vs 7730
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 vs 7730
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3595
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3595
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 606
  • Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11104 vs 5952
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2048 vs 1280
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 34824 vs 29267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9566 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9566 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 3595
PassMark - G2D Mark 792 vs 606
PassMark - G3D Mark 11104 vs 5952

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29267
34824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3335
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
606
792
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5952
11104
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Geekbench - OpenCL 29267 34824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7730 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7730 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3595 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3595 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 3335
PassMark - G2D Mark 606 792
PassMark - G3D Mark 5952 11104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 477.015
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4321

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Navi 14 GM204
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 367 364
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $549
Price now $605.06
Value for money (0-100) 21.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1250 MHz 1216 MHz
Compute units 20
Core clock speed 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 2048
Pixel fill rate 40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 100 GTexel/s 144 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 165 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 5,200 million
CUDA cores 2048
Floating-point performance 4,981 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pins
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 1

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
BatteryBoost
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Surround