AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 576.4x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 535
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36824 vs 24089
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 67.178
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1816.61
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 7.435
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 88.889
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 355.166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 vs 535 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36824 vs 24089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 vs 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 vs 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 vs 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 vs 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 vs 355.166 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1536
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8060 vs 6775
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3670
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3670
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8060 vs 6775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6775 | 8060 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 | 535 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36824 | 24089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK110B |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 377 | 374 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 902 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |