AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 502.3x better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 486
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 486 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2000x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 37% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 vs 3141
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 11524
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 31.301
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 vs 572.795
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 2.83
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 26.388
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 162.706
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 4042
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 2221
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 4042
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 2221
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 vs 3141 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 11524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 vs 31.301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 vs 572.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 vs 2.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 vs 26.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 vs 162.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 vs 4042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 vs 4042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 3657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 486 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11524 | 57671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 56.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 4.602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 64.428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 257.062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 705 | 513 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Price now | $104.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 2.6 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 170 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |