AMD Radeon Pro 555 versus AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555 and AMD Radeon RX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 502.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,306 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 60-80 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 486
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 18 April 2017 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,306 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 60-80 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 486 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090-1175 MHz versus 850 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 40.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 768
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 37% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5100 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 versus 3141
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 11524
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 versus 31.301
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 versus 572.795
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 versus 2.83
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 versus 26.388
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 162.706
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 versus 4042
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 2221
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 versus 4042
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 2221
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 40.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 768 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5100 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 versus 3141 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 11524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 versus 31.301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 versus 572.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 versus 2.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 versus 26.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 162.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 versus 4042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 versus 4042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 3657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 486 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11524 | 57671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 56.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 4.602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 64.428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 257.062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Polaris 21 |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 705 | 513 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Prix maintenant | $104.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,306 gflops | 2.6 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.8 GTexel / s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.6 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |