AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 340
  • Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11207 vs 8148
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 3 December 2015
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 vs 340
Geekbench - OpenCL 11207 vs 8148

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
  • Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3461 vs 3141
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 31.301
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 572.795
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.83
  • Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 26.388
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 162.706
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 4042
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2221
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 4042
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2221
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3461 vs 3141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281 vs 31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113 vs 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5 vs 2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048 vs 26.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 172.896 vs 162.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3141
3461
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
659
340
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11207
8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.301
47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
572.795
782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.83
3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.388
51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
162.706
172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4042
4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4042
4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3355
Name AMD Radeon Pro 555 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3141 3461
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 340
Geekbench - OpenCL 11207 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.301 47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 572.795 782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.83 3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.388 51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.706 172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4042 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4042 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 3355

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 555 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell
Code name Polaris 21 GM107
Launch date 5 June 2017 3 December 2015
Place in performance rating 718 719
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 1029 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,306 gflops 1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 640
Texture fill rate 40.8 GTexel / s 43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 1,870 million
Boost clock speed 1098 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.6 GB / s 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus