AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 340
Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11375 vs 8148

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 3 December 2015
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 340
Geekbench - OpenCL	11375 vs 8148

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 3141
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 31.301
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 572.795
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.83
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 26.388
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 162.706
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 4042
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2221
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 4042
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3453 vs 3141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 26.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896 vs 162.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3141

3453

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

659

340

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11375

8148

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.301

47.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

572.795

782.113

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.83

3.5

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.388

51.048

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

162.706

172.896

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3355

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141	3453
PassMark - G2D Mark	659	340
Geekbench - OpenCL	11375	8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301	47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	572.795	782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83	3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.388	51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706	172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2221	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2221	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 21	GM107
Launch date	5 June 2017	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	719	720
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1029 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops	1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1098 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus