AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• Around 80% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3797 vs 3141
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14360 vs 11375
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 vs 31.301
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 720.592 vs 572.795
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 vs 2.83
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 vs 26.388
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 vs 162.706
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 4042
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2566 vs 2221
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 4042
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2566 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3141 3797
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	659 337
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11375 14360
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.301 67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	572.795 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.83 3.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.388 57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.706 223.296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3337

Compare specifications (specs)