AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 38 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 374.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 576
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 153
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1876
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1876
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s vs 38 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 vs 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 850 MHz
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 21 | G92 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 712 | 1256 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-IV |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |