AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs ATI FirePro V8800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and ATI FirePro V8800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 555

ATI FirePro V8800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 825 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.8x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 208 Watt
Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 2281
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 445
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 vs 18.27
7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 vs 0.357

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 7 April 2010
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 208 Watt
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141 vs 2281
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301 vs 18.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83 vs 0.357

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800

Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 1600 vs 768
2x better floating-point performance: 2,640.0 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36751 vs 11413
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1180.667 vs 572.795
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.357 vs 26.388
Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 228.843 vs 162.706
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3575 vs 2221
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3575 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	66.0 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1600 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36751 vs 11413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1180.667 vs 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.357 vs 26.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	228.843 vs 162.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3575 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3575 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3141

2281

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

659

445

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11413

36751

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.301

18.27

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

572.795

1180.667

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.83

0.357

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.388

49.357

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

162.706

228.843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3575

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3575

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3356

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 555	ATI FirePro V8800
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141	2281
PassMark - G2D Mark	659	445
Geekbench - OpenCL	11413	36751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301	18.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	572.795	1180.667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83	0.357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.388	49.357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706	228.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2221	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2221	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	3356

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 555	ATI FirePro V8800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Polaris 21	Cypress
Launch date	5 June 2017	7 April 2010
Place in performance rating	722	725
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,499
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	825 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops	2,640.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	1600
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s	66.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	208 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,154 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB / s	147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0